Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6078 (UTT)

HUSAN BEGUM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/419/2025 · 2025-08-05

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6864-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 419 OF 2025 05TH AUGUST, 2025 Husan Begum …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel Counsel for the respondents : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State / respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 : Ms. Lata Negi, learned counsel for the victim The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the writ petition the authorities have fairly dropped their action as the proposed action was contrary to the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court In Re Directions in Matter of Demolition of Structures, 1 2025:UHC:6864-DB reported in (2025) 5 SCC 1, and in that view the cause of action for the instant writ petition does not survive. 2) The submission is placed on record. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 4) As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. ____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 05TH AUGUST, 2025 Negi 2 HIMANS HU NEGI Digitally signed by HIMANSHU NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=bb3b60774012c1ef1dae20d13a af116e73351fdaf6878326386908a7f90d5 757, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=75BD9D0FB7F4A80990FC 51A722A6BC552D470EB4FD2F88DDF7C 18DB2A1524A4D, cn=HIMANSHU NEGI Date: 2025.08.06 12:00:33 +05'30'