IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3130 OF 2025 Between: K. Sreeramulu, S/o. Late K. Narayana, Aged 80 years, Occ: Retd Employee Agraharam, Thimmanayanipalle Village, Sodam Mandal, Chittoor District State of Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Tahsildar, Sodam, Sodam Mandal, Chittoor District. 4. K Ramachandraiah, S/o. Chinna Muni Swamy, Age 92 years, Occ; Business, Agraharam, Thimmanayanipalli Village, Sodam Mandal, Chittoor District, State of Andhra Pradesh. 5. P Murali, S/o. Late Gurappa, Aged about45 years, Occ; Agriculturist, Karakamanda Village, Somala Mandal, Suraiahgaripalli Post, Chittoor District. 6. P. Chandra Mouli, S/o. Late Gurappa, aged about 50 years, Occ; Agriculturist, Karakamanda Village, Somala Mandal, Suraiahgaripalli Post, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 in issuing the proceedings order vide ROC. L3/e- 480324/2024 dt. 18.01.2025, in respect of the subject Agriculture land to an extent of Ac 01.72 cents. ^ situated in Sy No 260/3, at S NadimpalN vHtage Thimmanayanipal li Revenue Village, Sodam Mandal, Chittoor District, State of Andhra Pradesh, without following due process of law and without jurisdiction, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, void and invalid and infringement of Articles 14, . 21 and 300 of the Constitution India and is in violation of principles of natural justice and therefore, to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondent nos. 2 and 3, not to interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said subject land, which is petitioner's ancestral property succeeded through salve patti. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the-wrlt petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, especially respondent no. 3 along with his staff and unofficial respondents, not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject Agriculture land to an extent of Ac 01.72 cents, situated in Sy No 260/3, at S Nadimpalli village, Thimmanayanipa Hi Revenue Village, Sodam Mandal, Chittoor District, State of Andhra Pradesh, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G. KOTINAGULU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010055662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) n [3328] FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3130/2025 Between: 1.K SREERAMULU, S/0 LATE K. NARAYANA, AGED 80 YEARS, OCC RETD EMPLOYEE, AGRAHARAM, THIMMANAYANIPALLE VILLAGE, SODAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARY, BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REVENUE SECRETARIAT 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE TAHSILDAR, SODAM, SODAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4.K RAMACHANDRAIAH, S/0. CHINNA MUNI SWAMY, AGE 92 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, AGRAHARAM, THIMMANAYANIPALLI VILLAGE, SODAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.P MURALI, S/0. LATE GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, KARAKAMANDA VILLAGE, SOMALA MANDAL, SURAIAHGARIPALLI POST, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6.P CHANDRA MOULI, S/0. LATE GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, KARAKAMANDA VILLAGE, SOMALA ▼ 2 MANDAL, SURAIAHGARIPALLI POST, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Counselfor the Petitioner: 1.G KOTINAGULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri Santhi Chandra, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to avail the other legal remedies available to the Writ Petitioner under law. Request granted. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to avail the other remedies as available to him under law. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. seeks to as 3. //TRUE COPY// SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To. 1. One CC to Sri G. Kotinagulu Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Courtof Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:07/02/2025 jTo* ANDfiiSI ORDER * 0 3 MAR 2025 m WP.No.3130 of 2025 Co ^ . Current Section . ^ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS