Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-27872-
108
AJAY KUMAR SHARMA STATE OF PUNJAB
CORAM:
Present:
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
1. offence because FIR is yet to be registered is presuming from Complaint No. blanket anticipatory bail
2. submits that despite issuance of notice, he is not his no-cooperation made him disentitle to any relief. 3. withdraw the present petition and liberty be granted to him to file a representation to the concerned SSP and the expeditiously. 4. 29.05.2025, then the concerned SSP to either decide officer having the -2025 (O&M) -1-
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AJAY KUMAR SHARMA
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate for the petitioner (through VC). Ms. Navreet Kaur Barnala, Asst. AG, Punjab
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. The petitioner apprehending arrest offence because FIR is yet to be registered is presuming Complaint No. 643-P.C-4/25 dated 25.04.2025 blanket anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The counsel for the State has oppose that despite issuance of notice, he is not appearing cooperation made him disentitle to any relief. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he withdraw the present petition and liberty be granted to him to file a representation to the concerned SSP and the concerned officer be directed to
Given above, if petitioner makes a fresh representation on or before .2025, then the concerned SSP to either decide the rank of PCS within 14 days. It is clarified that
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-27872-2025 (O&M) Decided on: 20.05.2025
…. PETITIONER
…. RESPONDENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Ms. Navreet Kaur Barnala, Asst. AG, Punjab. apprehending arrest in any congnizable/non-bailable offence because FIR is yet to be registered is presuming that FIR is likely to be registered 4/25 dated 25.04.2025, has come before this Court seeking under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The counsel for the State has opposed maintainability of the prayer and appearing before the investigator and cooperation made him disentitle to any relief. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition and liberty be granted to him to file a representation to concerned officer be directed to decide the same Given above, if petitioner makes a fresh representation on or before .2025, then the concerned SSP to either decide it himself or by authorizing any within 14 days.
It is clarified that this order will eclipse
bailable d ing d maintainability of the prayer and and be permitted to withdraw the present petition and liberty be granted to him to file a representation to the same Given above, if petitioner makes a fresh representation on or before authorizing any will eclipse Anju Goel 2025.05.23 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-27872-
after 29.05.2025, in case, no representation is filed
5. stand disposed of. 20.05.2025 anju
-2025 (O&M) -2-
2 .2025, in case, no representation is filed till that date The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
till that date. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No
All pending applications, if any, Anju Goel 2025.05.23 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh