Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Promila Devi and others CMP (M) No. 172 of 2025 28.5.2025 Present: Mr.Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr.Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr.Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondents No. 4 and 5. CMP (M) No. 172 of 2025 Present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 161 days in filing the appeal. Though no reply has been filed on behalf of respondents, but the prayer made in the application has been opposed vehemently on the ground that day-to-day delay, as required to be explained under law, has not been explained. Taking into consideration averments made in the application and submission made by learned counsel for the parties, delay of 161 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered. The application stands allowed and disposed of. FAO No. …. of 2025 (FAOST No. 3187 of 2025) Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that loss of dependency has been assessed as 11,000/- and, therefore, amount of compensation was to be ₹ calculated by taking multiplicand of 7334/- after deducting ₹ 1/3rd amount towards personal expenses, but the compensation has been calculated by applying multiplicand of 9,000/- and in case amount of compensation is determined by ₹ applying multiplicand of 7334/-, appellant shall be satisfied. ₹ Learned counsel for the respondents/claimants seeks time to have instructions. Be obtained by next date. List for further orders on 4th June, 2025. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. 28th May, 2025 (Keshav)