Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60730 (KAR)

SRI MAHALING S/O RAMAPPA HONAWAD v. SMT. LAXMIBAI D/O SATTEPPA MADANE

WP/107547/2023 · 2025-07-21

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9003 WP No. 107547 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 107547 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MAHALING S/O. RAMAPPA HONAWAD, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 2. SRI. SHIVAPPA S/O. RAMAPPA HONAWAD, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KRISHNA KITTUR, TQ: KAGAWAD, DIST: BELAGAVI. 3. SMT. SEETAWWA W/O. SHIVAPPA KUNCHANUR, AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O. JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 4. SMT. MAHADEVI W/O. PARAGOND BIRADAR, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O. BASARAGI, TQ: JATT, DIST: SANGLI, MAHARASTRA STATE. 5. SMT. KALAVATI W/O. SHRISHAIL KORI, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O. SAVALAGI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. THE PETITIONER NO.1 IS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY OF THE PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 5. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ P. MUDHOL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. LAXMIBAI D/O. SATTEPPA MADANE, AGE: , OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK, VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9003 WP No. 107547 of 2023 R/O. JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587301. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, JAMKHANDI, AT. JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING A. TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN LAC NO.133/2001 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND (SR.DIVISION)JAMKHANDI AND TO ISSUE DIRECTION TO THE TRIAL COURT TO RECEIVE THE INTERIM APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-A ON RECORD AND TO DECIDE THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. B. TO DIRECT THE TRIAL COURT NOT TO DISBURSE THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT DEPOSITED BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT WITHOUT HEARING THE PETITIONERS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER IS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. 2. Memo and submission is placed on record. 3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE Ckk List No.: 1 Sl No.: 72