Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6073 (RAJ)

RAJANI MEENA D/O BADRINARAYAN MEENA W/O LATE BANESH KUMAR MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2005/2025 · 2025-02-06

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5302] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2005/2025 Rajani Meena D/o Badrinarayan Meena W/o Late Banesh Kumar Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Khatipura, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 06/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to file a representation before the competent authority for redressal of her grievance. Further learned counsel has placed reliance upon circular dated 18.05.2020 and has submitted that as per the said circular candidate under the widow category should be given posting upon the nearby places of her permanent residence. However, it is pleaded that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). [2025:RJ-JP:5302] (2 of 2) [CW-2005/2025] This Court directs respondents/competent authority to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated 19.02.2024. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /374