Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1251 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Neelam Kumari
…….Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Sparsh
Bhushan, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent- State.
Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate and Mr. Anil Kumar Manget, Advocate, for respondent No.7. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file second appeal before the Director Women and Child Development in terms of Clause 12.4 of Notification dated
29.02.2024. Ordered accordingly. Since petitioner, at first instance, chose wrong forum by filing petition at hand in this
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Court and thereafter, matter remained pending before this Court for considerable time, plea of limitation shall not be come in the way of the petitioner in prosecuting the second appeal, if any. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 19, 2025 (shankar)