SHAHNAWAZ AHMAD MAGRAY v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION)
WP(C)/154/2025 · 2025-01-25
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6072 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6072 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.17 Supp. Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP (C) NO. 154/2025 SHAHNAWAZ AHMAD MAGRAY …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M.A. Wani, Advocate Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF JAND K AND ORS ...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER 25.01.2025 After the brief submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel satisfied if the writ petition is directed to be treated as representation and is decided within a time frame. Prayer allowed. Ordered accordingly. The respondents are directed to treat the present writ petition as representation and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date copy of this
order alongwith copy of writ petition/representation alongwith annexures is made available to them.
Disposed of.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 25.01.2025
“ARIF”