Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60719 (CHH)

KU. AKANKSHA MEMON v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2793/2023 · 2025-12-03

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:58987 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2793 of 2023 1 - Ku. Akanksha Memon D/o Shri Anish Memon, Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 17, Nayapara, Tahsil And, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector, Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 3 - Deputy Collector, Land Record Branch, Collectorate, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R), Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, PL. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 04/12/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the respondent authorities pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside suspension dated 14.05.2020 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent no. 4, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to reinstate the Petitioner in the services, in the interest of justice. 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide all monetary benefits the Petitioner of the suspension period with interest within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.5 Any other relief, which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed..” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat