Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60719 (BOM)

Smt Anjana Ishwar Nalawade v. Mr Deepak Urmil Shiv Kapoor

CP/566/2025 · 2025-10-16

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 938-CP-564-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 564 OF 2025 MAHENDRA S/O SHANTILAL DHODAD AND ANOTHER VERSUS MR. DEEPAK URMIL SHIV KAPOOR AND OTHERS ... Mr. Rajendra K. Temkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondents/State Ms. Sunita Dasharat Shelke, Advocate for Respondents No.4 And 5 ... WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2025 IN WP/10389/2023 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 567 OF 2025 IN WP/9255/2023 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 566 OF 2025 IN WP/9327/2023 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 562 OF 2025 IN WP/10347/2023 CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Learned advocate for respondents No.4 and 5, on instructions, undertakes to pay the petitioners the rental compensation calculated by the S.L.A.O, Ahmednagar/Sub-divisional O昀케cer, Karjat within a period of two months from today. 2. By recording the above statement as undertaking to this Court, the contempt petitions are disposed of. SVH 2025:BHC-AUG:29693-DB 2 938-CP-564-25.odt 3. It is brought to our notice that S.L.A.O. has calculated the amount till 30/09/2024. Since one more year is passed now, the interest at the rate of 6% for this year shall also be calculated and paid to the petitioners within a period of two months from today. 4. It is made clear that non-adherence to the undertaking and direction by the respondents shall be treated as aggravated contempt. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH