SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.420 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Suraiya Naaz, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the complainant, who is permitted to file his vakalatnama, during course of the day. 4. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has put to challenge the F.I.R. No.337 of 2024 dated 19.11.2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, registered with Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun and other ancillary reliefs. 5. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail, but according to her since no prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, she wants the F.I.R. to be quashed by this Court. 6. I have perused the F.I.R. (annexure no.1 to the writ petition). 7. From perusal of the F.I.R., prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, therefore, it cannot be said that the same deserves to be quashed. 8. Accordingly, since prima facie case is made out against the petitioner in F.I.R. no question of interference arises, in view of the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Niharika Infrastructure P. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 (19) SCC 401. 9. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.06.2025 SK