IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 138 SANONI AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a official respondents the hands of respondent dated 16.05.2025 ( 2. At the very outset, lea submitted that the petitioner 16.05.2025 before the House Officer, Police Station Pehowa, Kurukshetra (Annexure P their grievances as been considered and no action has that at this stage, the issued to respondent No. the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: SANONI AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 and to take action on dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Superintendent of Police, House Officer, Police Station Pehowa, Kurukshetra (Annexure P grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are respondent No. 2- Superintendent of Police, the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5258 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.05.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation rned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Kurukshetra and Station House Officer, Police Station Pehowa, Kurukshetra (Annexure P-5) raising petition but the same has not yet been taken thereon. He further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are of Police, Kurukshetra to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action of the the at their representation has recently filed a representation on Kurukshetra and Station raising petition but the same has not yet further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are decide necessary action Jyoti 2025.05.21 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 20.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5258 of 2025 Notice of motion. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana ted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No No.5258 of 2025 -2- Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana, who is present in Court, ted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, the paperbook be out disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.05.21 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document