HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16732 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. It is alleged that respondent no.8 has encroached upon the land of petitioner. Since the dispute is essentially a private dispute between the respondent no.8 and petitioner as respondent no.8 is a private party, therefore, no writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. September 10, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Maurya, Gaurav Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Ramnath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad