Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60704 (ALL)

VIVEK KUMAR PANDEY v. ASSISTANT ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (ACCOUNTS & ENTITLEMENT) AND ANOTHER

WRIA/7393/2025 · 2025-05-25

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88872 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7393 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Pandey Respondent :- Assistant Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlement) And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Kumar Tiwari,Niraj Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- Bal Mukund Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Respondent no.2 rejecting the claim for compassionate appointment. 3. Sri Bal Mukund, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 submits that the petitioner should avail remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal as the department in question stands notified under Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the above facts. 5. In view of the above, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter. Liberty rest with the petitioner to avail the remedy available before Central Administrative Tribunal, if so advised. 6. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad