Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60695 (CHH)

RAJIYA MOBIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/6214/2025 · 2025-12-03

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:58755 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6214 of 2025 1 - Rajiya Mobin W/o Mobin Khan Aged About 56 Years R/o Talapara Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Mobin Khan S/o Late Noor Khan Aged About 62 Years R/o L-16 Alaska Homes Colony, Bijour, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Presently Working As U.D.T. Govt. Middle School, Lagra Vikas Khand Block Bilha, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director, Education Department Block Bilaspur District Bilaspur 4 - District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Radha Sahara @ Farida Begum W/o Shri Mobin Khan Aged About 30 Years R/o Alaska Homes Colony, Bijour, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Tapan Chandra, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 04 /12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and conduct the departmental 2 inquiry against the Respondent No. 2, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is first wife of the Respondent No. 2 who had developed relation with his maid and thereafter, had performed marriage with her and from their relationship, they are having one child. He submits that the act of the Respondent No. 2 attract the bigamous marriage. 3. On the other hand, Learned counsel for the Respondent/State submits that from the cause-title of the writ petition, it is apparent that the petitioner as well as the Respondent No. 2 are Muslims and they are governed by mohammedan law. 4. In view of the aforementioned facts of the case, looking the nature of relief as prayed for in this writ petition, in the opinion of this Court, no relief as prayed for can be granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY