Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60693 (PNJ)

SUMAN RANI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/11425/2018 · 2025-09-02

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11425-2018 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 02.09.2025 SUMAN RANI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Kartikey Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. AG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 19.04.2018 (Annexure P-11) vide which the respondents have taken a decesion to appoint Peon and Lashkar through a private contractor with a further prayer to issue a direction that the petitioner be not replaced by fresh contract Peon through a Private Agency and the petitioner be allowed to continue till regular appointments are made in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the letter dated 06.02.2025 asserting that the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed off, having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any shall disposed off. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 02.09.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.09.02 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document