IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 201 IOIN-1-CWP-4401-2011 in/and CWP-4401-2011 Date of Decision: 12.08.2025 Chandigarh Administration and another ....Petitioner Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh and others ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek K. Premi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S.Guliani, Advocate for respondents No.2, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 17. **** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) IOIN-1-CWP-4401-2011 The IOIN has been listed as the service of unserved respondents is still pending. On request of learned counsel for the parties, the main case is taken on Board today. The IOIN stands disposed of. CWP-4401-2011 1. In the present petition, the challenge is to the order dated 10.01.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.08.13 19:49 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CWP-4401-2011 -2- whereby it is held that the respondents be not replaced by another set of contractual appointees subject to certain conditions. 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.2, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14 and 17 submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is akin to the issue raised in CWP-19280-2011 titled as Chandigarh Administration, Chandigarh and another vs. Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh and others, which writ petition has already been decided on 31.08.2024 and the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of in the same terms. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to rebut the said submissions. 4. The present petition is also disposed of in terms of CWP-19280- 2011. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) August 12, 2025 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.08.13 19:49 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC