HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 719 of 2025 (S/S) Pawan Kumar ….......Petitioner Vs. Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others ……....... Respondents Present : Mr. Sachin Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- “a. Issue a writ, order in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 11.09.2024 passed by the respondent no.4 to that extent the recovery has directed (contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition). b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the arrear of amount i.e. Rs.1,73,505/- along with interest @ 18% per annum from the dated of retirement till date of actual payment. c. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to re-fix the pay scale of the petitioner as per 2nd and 3rd ACP and to pay the difference of the payment towards the arrear of payment of petitioner. 2 d. To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena; and connected cases. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact. 5. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena; and connected cases. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 07.05.2025 Sanjay