S. No. 01 Regular IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 122/2025 IQRA JAN AND ANR …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Kala, AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 19.02.2025 1. Nemo for the petitioners. 2. This is a third consecutive non-appearance on behalf of counsel for the petitioners. 3. Writ petition is for seeking direction for protection of the petitioners in relation to solemnization of marriage by them against the wishes of their parents. 4. Continuing absence of counsel for the petitioners is a pointer towards the fact that the petitioners are not interested in having the protection otherwise desired through the medium of the present writ petition. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 6. Given the fact that it is a reckoning cause of action, as such dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution will not come in the way of petitioners with a writ petition bearing fresh cause of action. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 19.02.2025 AAMIR Amir Rashid Sofi I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 24.02.2025 10:50