Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60674 (ALL)

SHAKINA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/10541/2025 · 2025-05-21

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:87437-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10541 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shakina And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shahnawaz Akhtar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R, dated 30.6.2024 registered as Case Crime No.0017 of 2024, under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Budaun and for a direction to respondents not to arrest the petitioners pursuant to aforesaid FIR. 3. On the other hand, learned AGA on the instructions states that in the instant matter police report/Chargesheet is already submitted to the Competent Court on 13.5.2025, as such, no cause of action survives. Even otherwise the charge-sheet is not under challenge and accordingly, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. Confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners state that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to press appropriate relief in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid leave, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 22.5.2025/Mukesh Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad