Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60672 (ALL)

PRAMOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/17692/2025 · 2025-05-21

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86627 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17692 of 2025 Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. Learned A.G.A. has informed that the notice to the informant has been served on 29.03.2025. 4. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 5. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.86 of 2024, under Sections 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Jasrana, District Firozabad, during the pendency of trial. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. PW-2/victim has been examined during trial and she has completely resiled from her earlier statement and has been cross-examined by the public prosecutor after declaring her hostile. 7. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated that there is no likelihood of conviction of the applicant in the present case. Learned counsel has further stated that there is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.12.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but could not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that the victim has turned hostile, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Pramod Kumar, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad