Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6067 (KAR)

SMT BHIMAVVA W/O KAREPPA ALIAS KARIYAPPA MUTHYANATTI v. SHRI KALMESH S/O BHIMARAI SULADAL

MFA/103774/2022 · 2025-02-05

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103774 OF 2022 (MV) BETWEEN 1 . SMT BHIMAVVA W/O KAREPPA @ KARIYAPPA MUTHYANATTI AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KARAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI 590001. 2 . SRI KAREPPA @ KARIYAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA MUTHYANATTI AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KARAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI 590001. 3 . SRI. SANTOSH KAREPPA @ KARIYAPPA MUTHYANATTI AGE. 20 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. KARAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI 590001. 4 . KUM. GANGAPPA S/O KAREPPA @ KARIYAPPA MUTHYANATTI AGE. 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. KARAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI,- 590001. 5 . KUM. LAXMI D/O KAREPPA @ KARIYAPPA MUTHYANATTI AGE. 15 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. KARAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-590001, SINCE MINOR REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER I.E. APPELLANT NO.1 6 . KUM. SATYAVVA D/O KAREPPA @ KARIYAPPA MUTHYNATTI AGE. 16 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, 2 R/O. KARAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI, PIN CODE. 590001. SINCE MINOR REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER, I.E. APPELLANT NO.1 ... APPELLANTS (By SRI : S M KALWAD) AND 1 . SHRI KALMESH S/O BHIMARAI SULADAL AGE. MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 103, JANATA PLOT, TUMMARAGUDDI, TQ. AND DIST: BELAGAVI 590001. 2 . THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., E-8 EPIP RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN 302001. …RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 20.12.2021 passed in MVC No.1673/2018 on the file of The IX Additional District and Sessions Judge and Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Belagavi. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Two weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections. Failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE 3 //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 29.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 103774 of 2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 05.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: vg C By: vk