Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6066 (AP)

POTHULA CHANDRA SEKHAR NAIDU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/3230/2025 · 2025-04-01

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010055332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 3230/2025 Between: Pothula Chandra Sekhar Naidu ...PETITIONER AND The State of A.P.,& Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T VENU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 2 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.3230 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents for non-payment of the amounts due to the Petitioner for the works completed by him under Agreement No.73/2023-2024, dated 25.09.2023, wherein the Petitioner was entrusted the work of “Laying CC road from Gangireddy Hospital to PADA Office road in Bakarapuram Sachivalayam of Pulivendula Municipality” under Pulivendula Area Development Agency (PADA), as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard M/s. T. Venu Gopal, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Gudapati Lakshmi Narayana, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent-Municipality. 3. At the time of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent-Municipality passed on the written instructions signed by the Commissioner, Pulivendula Municipality, wherein it is mentioned that the measurements were recorded and the bills were raised for gross amount of Rs.28,84,884/- and net amount of Rs.25,73,545/- was uploaded in CFMS Portal with the Token No.2024-282104 and the same was credited to the Petitioner on 30.03.2025. 4. In that view, as the grievance of the Petitioner is redressed, no further orders are required to be passed in the Writ Petition. 3 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed by placing the written instructions on record. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 01.04.2025 IS 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.3230 of 2025 Date: 01.04.2025 IS