MAHESH S/O KALAKAPPA PATTED v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/107084/2025 · 2025-09-24
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60653 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60653 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13061 WP No. 107084 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107084 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
MAHESH S/O KALAKAPPA PATTED AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. PVT. WORK, R/O. YELBURGA-583236 TALUK YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR BALAGERIMATH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY, DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001
2.
THE VICE CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE SCIENCE RAICHURU-584101
3.
THE REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE SCIENCE RAICHURU-584101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO RELEASE THE FINAL SELECTION LIST AND TO GIVE THE APPOINTMENT ORDER TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED.
15/09/2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.
Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13061 WP No. 107084 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent No.1.
2. Sri.C.R.Herimath.,
learned counsel on behalf of Sri.Manthesh Patil., learned counsel is directed to accept notice for respondents No.2 and 3.
3. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order or direction directing the R2 and R3 to release the final selection list and to give the appointment order to the petitioner as per the representations dated 15.09.2025, vide Annexure-D
b. Such other writ or direction or orders may deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, including an order for costs be passed in the interest of justice.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the entire procedure has been complied with, the final selection list and appointment orders have not been issued. In furtherance of which a representation dated 15.09.2025 at Annexure-D had been submitted.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13061 WP No. 107084 of 2025
5. Whenever any representation is submitted to any statutory authority or a governmental authority it is required for the said authority to consider the same and pass necessary orders within a reasonable period of time, either accepting or rejecting the same. Neither having been done, I pass the following;
ORDER i. The writ petition is allowed. ii. A mandamus is issued, directing respondents to consider the representation dated 15.09.2025 at Annexure-D and pass necessary orders within a period of six weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35