IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56416 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2024 Thana- GARHI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1. Murari Yadav @ Amit Ranjan SON OF LATE RADHEY YADAV VILLAGE- DARIMA, PS- GARHI, DIST- JAMUI 2. YOGENDRA YADAV SON OF RADHEY YADAV VILLAGE- DARIMA, PS- GARHI, DIST- JAMUI 3. UPENDRA YADAV SON OF RADHEY YADAV VILLAGE- DARIMA, PS- GARHI, DIST- JAMUI 4. SUNIL YADAV SON OF BRAHMDEO YADAV VILLAGE- DARIMA, PS- GARHI, DIST- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 21-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have filed the instant application for anticipatory bail, apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 448 and 354B of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the FIR, on the alleged date and time of occurrence petitioner no. 1 assaulted the informant’s brother-in- law (bhainsur) on his head by means of kulhari (axe) causing head injury. All the accused persons also came at her house with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56416 of 2024(4) dt.21-02-2025 2/3 deadly weapon they threatened and assaulted the husband of the informant by means of lathi causing injury to his hand. Petitioner no. 3 assaulted Rohit Yadav on his head by sword. Petitioner No. 1 also assaulted Sahdeo Yadav by means of Khanti. Sunil Yadav also assaulted her father in-law by means of Tangi. Female members were also assaulted and misbehaved by the accused persons. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. On perusal of the FIR it clearly transpires that there is land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case between the parties. Injury report of the injureds (annexed) suggests that they have sustained simple injury. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail 6. Keeping in view of the aforesaid fact and considering the previous enmity between the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56416 of 2024(4) dt.21-02-2025 3/3 connection with Garhi P.S. Case No. 8 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. 7. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. Prakash/- (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) U