Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6064 (RAJ)

SUMAN KUMARI MEENA D/O RAM KUNWAR MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2100/2025 · 2025-02-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2100/2025 Suman Kumari Meena D/o Ram Kunwar Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Hapawash, Tehsil Nagal Rajawatan, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Non- Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dausa. 4. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Dausa. 5. The Medical Officer In-Charge, Primary Health Centre, Chhareda, Block Dausa, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has not being reimbursed the arrears, on account of maternity leave availed by her, despite the fact that the same were availed in accordance with the governing Rules. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been working on the post of ANM and has availed the maternity leave from 03.10.2021 onwards as per Rule 103 of Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951. (2 of 2) [CW-2100/2025] Further, it is further submitted that various representations are filed by the petitioner however, the amount is yet not reimbursed. Considering the fact that the counsel representing the respondents has marked presence, notices need not be issued. Learned counsel for the respondents has ensured the Court that if a representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be duly adjudicated by the respondents within a stipulated period i.e. 30 days from the date of filing of the same. In light of the above, and taking note of the consensus drawn inter-se the parties, this Court directs the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and the same be adjudicated thereafter by way of a speaking order, within the stipulated period, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J HEENA/130