Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60634 (CHH)

DURGA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7498/2023 · 2025-12-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7498 of 2023 1 - Durga W/o Shri Heera Lal Aged About 26 Years R/o Ward No. 04, Barpara, Mandraud, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Department Of School Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Block-C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Department Of School Education Indrawati Bhawan, Block-C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.L. Bareth, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 08/12/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10/1That, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call for the entire records of the case for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction and direct the respondent authorities to accommodate the petitioner in view of the priority list submitted by her. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction and direct the Respondent No.2. to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner and pass the appropriate order for posting of the petitioner in view of the priority list/district. 10.4 That, any other relief(s) which the Hon'ble Court deems fit & proper may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat