IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPIL No. 6 of 2025 Date of Decision: 29.01.2025. Kuldeep Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents-State. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents-State. 2. It has been submitted that the petitioners have filed a combined representation along with other similarly situated persons to the Deputy Commissioner, Chamba (Annexure P-3), which has not been decided so far. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 3. Keeping in view the fact that the matter is pending before Deputy Commissioner, Chamba who has not taken any action in the matter till date, therefore, he is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners and other affected persons, if any, by passing a speaking order, after giving an opportunity of being heard within a period of three weeks’. 4. The present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Vacation Judge 29th January, 2025 (Chander)