The Sompet Gram Panchayat, v. The Assistant Accounts Officer,
WP/38862/2013 · 2025-07-06
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6063 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6063 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010054652013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 38862/2013 Between:
1. THE SOMPET GRAM PANCHAYAT,, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER G.ATCHUTA RAO S/O APPA RAO, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O SOMPET, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, APEPDCL KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LIMITED, OPERATION CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHATYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PTS.IV) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned Letter No.AAO/ERO/KSB/JAO-SUB-ERO-SPT/D.No.496/13, dated 19-062013 as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the G.O.Rt.No.80, dated
2
17-01-2009 and consequential G.O.Rt.No.1190, dated 18-07-2013 and consequentially this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 19-06-2013 and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 48305 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Letter No.AAO/ERO/KSB/JAO-SUB- EROSPT/D.No.496/13, dated 19-06-2013 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 409 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders, passed on dated 31-12-2013 In W.P.MP.No.48305 of 2013 W.P.No.38862 of 2013 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
3. P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following:
::ORDER::
Sri M.R.Tagore, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through online would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 2.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 3
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 07.07.2025 SNI
4
156 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.38862 of 2013
Dated: 07.07.2025 SNI