Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60613 (ALL)

PINKI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/10141/2025 · 2025-05-18

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84014-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10141 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pinki Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Kumar Singh,Neetu Pal,Priyanka Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. 2. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the First Information Report dated 11.2.2025 registered as Case Crime No.35 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 85, 80 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, at Police Station Khadda, District Kushinagar and with a further prayer not to arrest the petitionersin pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. 3. After substantial argument, once the court has declined to quash the impugned first information report, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to invoke the remedy as available in law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is aggrieved, he may avail the remedy as available in law. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 19.5.2025/Mukesh Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad