HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16128 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has no instructions in the matter therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 17, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd Shahrukh Wasim Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Sumaiya Ali And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad