MUKUND AMBAAS BHALERAO v. THE ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS
WP/6329/2019 · 2025-01-31
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60598 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60598 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
971 WP NO. 6329 OF 2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6329 OF 2019 MUKUND AMBAAS BHALERAO VERSUS THE ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ameet R. Vaidya Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. N. K. Choudhari … CORAM :
MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 31.01.2025 PER COURT : . Parties are unanimous that the issue being raised in the petition has become academic, inasmuch as petitioner has been granted the pension.
2. In the light of the above, keeping open the issue for revision of the pension and the right of the petitioner to agitate their cause, the petition is disposed of.
( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:2761-DB