NANKA YADAV @ NANKE YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/18147/2025 · 2025-05-20
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60585 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60585 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86107 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18147 of 2025 Applicant :- Nanka Yadav @ Nanke Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Yadav,Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Santosh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Alok Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the order dated 24.03.2022 and 15.01.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 13th, Allahabad in Session Trial No. 180 of 2012, (State Vs. Rajkumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 741 of 2008, under Sections 406, 411, 414 of I.P.C., Police Station- Naini, District Allahabad, whereby non-bailable warrant as well as proceeding under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. has been initiated against the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that at the time of issuing non-bailable warrants the applicant was on bail. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for appearance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant direct NBW has been issued.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 528 of B.N.S.S is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by
the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appear before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against applicant shall be kept in abeyance.
Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Ishan Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad