Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6056 (MAD)

Aruna Srikanth v. Shantha Rajabather

A/1082/2025 · 2026-03-09

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 1082 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A No. 1082 of 2025 IN CS NO. 738 OF 2002 Aruna Srikanth 43340 Chester Drive Sterling Heights Michigan 48314 USA ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. Shantha Rajabather W/o.late E.S.Rajabather, 4th Floor, Old No.37, New No.85, 1st Main Road, Adyar, Chennai-600 020. 2. Madras Purasawalkam Hindu Janopaka Saswatha Nidhi Limited, Rep. by its Commissioner, No.168, Vellala Street, Purasawalkam, Chennai-600 084. 3. Raj And Co, Auctioneers, No.7, Sunkurama Street, 1st Floor, Chennai-600 001. 4. R.Dinesh alias Dinesh Kumar S/o.Late E.S.Rajabather, No.1, N.Street, Kilpauk Garden, Near Jayalalitha Stadium Chennai-600 010. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Judge’s summons filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 100 days in representation of the application papers in ATN20220020893C202400015 and Receive the same on file. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1082 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 3 For Applicant(s): M/s.K.F.Manavalan Bijesh Thomas Sakthivel K For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Ramakrishnan for D1&D2 ORDER This application is filed by one of the legal representatives of the deceased original plaintiff to condone the delay of 100 days in re-presentation. 2. Considering the reasons set out in the affidavit and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. 09-03-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No (2/3) KAL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1082 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 3 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KAL A No. 1082 of 2025 IN CS NO. 738 OF 2002 09-03-2026 (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis