Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6056 (BOM)

RAOSAHEB DAGDU SAPKAL v. SUNIL VITTHAL JADHAV AND OTHERS

CA/10666/2019 · 2025-04-15

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 194-ca-10666-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10666 OF 2019 IN SAST/1299/2019 Raosaheb Dagdu Sapkal VERSUS Sunil Vitthal Jadhav And Others ... Adv. S. V. Bhosale And Adv. D. A. Naik, Advocates for Applicant Adv. B. G. Sagade, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Adv. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.3 ….. CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 15TH APRIL, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties. 2. Applicant seeks to condone the delay of 20 days caused in filing Second Appeal. 3. Perused the application and reasons stated therein. It appears that the delay has been properly explained. 4. In that view of the matter application is allowed, delay of 20 days caused in filing Second Appeal is condoned. 5. Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objection and place for admission on 18.06.2025. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2025 2025:BHC-AUG:11405