- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15143 RFA No. 100031 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100031 OF 2025 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. VENKANAGOUDA S/O GADIGEPPAGOUDA PATIL, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAGANAPUR, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 122. 2. SOMANGOUDA @ SOMALING S/O GADIGEPPAGOUDA PATIL, AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAGANAPUR, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 122. 3. LOKANNAGOUDA @ LOKANNA S/O GADIGEPPAGOUDA PATIL, AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BATAKURKI, TQ. RAMDURG, DIST. BAGALKOT-591 123. 4. HANAMANTAGOUDA S/O GADIGEPPAGOUDA PATIL, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAGANAPUR, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 122. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15143 RFA No. 100031 of 2025 5. MANJUNATH S/O GADIGEPPAGOUDA PATIL, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAGANAPUR, TQ. MUDHOL DIST. BAGALKOT-587 122. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GIRISH A. YADAWAD, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. RUKAMAVVA W/O RANGAPPA TULASIGERI, AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BOMBANABUDNI, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 313. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHIVANAND MALASHETTI, ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96(1) R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.10.2024 PASSED BY THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, MUDHOL IN O.S. NO.196/2021 AND DISMISS THE SAID SUIT BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DICTATING ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15143 RFA No. 100031 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) A memo is filed stating that dispute between the parties is settled in terms of the order passed in FDP 23/2024. It is stated that the plaintiff has received ₹ 40,00,000 towards her share in the property and accordingly, the Final Decree Proceeding is closed vide order dated 17.09.2025. 2. Since, plaintiff's claim is satisfied and the present appeal is filed challenging the decree in favour of the plaintiff, the Regular First Appeal is allowed and decree is modified in terms of the settlement in FDP No.23/2024. 3. The Judgment and decree dated 16.10.2024 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mudhol in O.S.No.196/2021 is modified in terms of the decree in FDP No.23/2024 dated 17.09.2025 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mudhol Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE brn CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 64