- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14303 MFA No. 105163 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 105163 OF 2024 (MV-I) BETWEEN: DEVAKKA W/O. NAGAPPA @ NAGARAJ CHANNOJI, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, R/O. HUGAR PLOT, GIRIYAL ROAD, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR M. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RENUKA W/O. LAXMAN HAKARI, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. BHADRAPUR, TQ: NAVALGUND, DIST: DHARWAD-582201. 2. FAKKIRESH S/O. LAXMAN HAKARI, AGE: 10 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. BHADRAPUR, TQ: NAVALGUND, DIST: DHARWAD-582201. 3. CHAMBANNA S/O. LAXMAN HAKARI, AGE: 08 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. BHADRAPUR, TQ: NAVALGUND, DIST: DHARWAD-582201. GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14303 MFA No. 105163 of 2024 4. BASAVARAJ S/O. LAXMAN HAKARI, AGE: 6 ½ YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. BHADRAPUR, TQ: NAVALGUND, DIST: DHARWAD-582201. (RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1 SMT. RENUKA) 5. MAHABOOBSAB S/O. PEERSAB THANED, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MASUTI ONI, BHADRAPUR, TQ: NAVALGUND, DIST: DHARWAD-582201. 6. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., ARIHANT BUILDING, KUSUGAL ROAD, KESHWAPUR, HUBBALLI-580023. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, HUBBALLI DATED 01.04.2024 IN M.V.C. NO.574/2019 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14303 MFA No. 105163 of 2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) Non representation on appellant’s side on call. The appeal was filed in the month of October, 2024 and till now office objections are not complied. Therefore the appeal stands dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE EM CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27