Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60538 (ALL)

MUKUL AGRAWAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CMRA/540/2023 · 2025-01-24

Donadi Ramesh, Manoj Kumar Gupta

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13075-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 540 of 2023 Applicant :- Mukul Agrawal And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The submission is that the respondents were not daily wagers/casual workers, as at page no.91 of the review petition, the State had indicated the dates on which the appellants attained or would attain age prescribed for superannuation of a regular employee and, therefore, the order deserves to be reviewed. 3. The mere indication of the date on which the appellants/applicants would attain the age prescribed for a regular employee for superannuation would not change their status. 4. We find no error apparent on the face of record to review our previous judgement/order. 5. Rejected. (Donadi Ramesh, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Ankit. Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad