1 2025:CGHC:59411 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13663 of 2025 1. Ramkisun Dewangan S/o Late Shri Gaind Ram Dewangan, Aged About 45 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat Kurra, Bajrang Chowk, Ward No. 12, Kurra, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Industries, Indravati Bhavan, New Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development And Marketing Co-Oprative Federation Limited, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Board Of Directors, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development And Marketing Co-Operative Federation Limited, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Raja Ram Dewangan, Now Warehouse Incharge Of State Handloom Development And Marketing Co-Operative Federation Limited, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Palaash Jha, Advocate For State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 08.12.2025 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner who is employee of Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development & Marketing Co-operative Federation Limited which is a Co-operative Society registered under Co- MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.12.16 18:52:02 +0530 2 operative Societies Act, 1960 assailing his transfer order dated 06.11.2025 passed by the Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development & Marketing Co-operative Federation Limited Raipur. 2. The petitioner is an employee of Co-operative Society registered under Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, as such, the petitioner has remedy to raise dispute before Registrar, Co-operative Society under Section 55(2) of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. 3. Let the petitioner raise dispute before the Registrar, Co-operative Society regarding his service condition within one month and in the eventuality of the filing of the application within one month neither the Registrar, Co-operative Societies nor the respondent will take plea of limitation and decide the case of the petitioner on its own merit. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not commented on the merit of the case. 5. With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish