HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2353/2025 Mohan Lal Saini W/o Shri Gaurishankar Saini, Resident Of Sikar, Tenant Soni Bhawan, Rajshri Cinema Road, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus M/s Aditya Builders, Khandela Road, Post Palsana, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, Distsict Sikar (Registered Firm) Through Partners. 1. Manoj Jangid S/o Shri Sanwarmal Jangid, Resident Of Village Sundarpura Palsana, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.). 2. Lalit Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Ramrichhpal Agarwal, Resident Of Ward No. 17, Post Palsana, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.). 3. Rajesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Durgadutt Soni, Resident Of Tirupati Nagar, Rampura Road, Sikar Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.). 4. Lakshman Singh S/o Shri Khem Singh, Resident Of Chhota Pana Ki Kothi, Palsana, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.). 5. Bhanwar Singh Khichar S/o Shri Ranveer Singh, Resident Of Dhod Road, Bypass Chouraha, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.). 6. Om Singh Doojod S/o Shri Gopal Singh, Resident Of Doojod, Tehsil And District Sikar Presently Residing At Hariram Bahad Marg, Polo Ground, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.). Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Chawla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order (2 of 2) [CW-2353/2025] 27/05/2025 1. At the outset, counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that during the pendency of this writ petition, the parties have entered into a compromise and the petitioner has vacated the rental premises and possession of the same has been handed over to the respondents. Counsel submits that under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this petition and the same has become infructuous. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not aware about the factum of compromise between the parties. 3. Considering the statement made by counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition stands dismissed as rendered infructuous. 4. However the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action/grievance still survives. 5. Stay application and all pending application (s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/14