Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6050 (PAT)

Md. Abujar @ Abuzar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./32275/2025 · 2026-05-14

Praveen Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32275 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2023 Thana- KASBA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1. Md. Abujar @ Abuzar S/o Md. Jafar @ Abujafar, @ Abu Zafar R/o Village- Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea 2. Md. Jafar @ Abujafar @ Abu Zafar S/o Late Ayub @ Manjoor @ Manzur Alam R/o Village- Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea 3. Shnaj @ Bibi Sahnaz @ Sahnaz W/o Md. Jafar @ Abu Jafar @ Abuy Zafar R/o Village- Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea 4. Abu Taliv @ Abu Talib S/o Md. Jafar @ Abu Jafar @ Abu Zafar R/o Village- Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea 5. Nanhi @ Najvin @ Bibi Nazneen D/o Md. Jafar @ Abujafar , W/o Md. Ansar R/o vill- Bochgaon, P.s.- Kasba, Distt.- Purnea 6. Abu Baka @ Abu Bakar Siddiuqe S/o Late Manjoor @ Late Md. Manzoo Alam R/o vill - Majgawan, P.s- Kasba, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rooksar Pravin W/o Md. Abujar, D/o Jamaluddin R/o vill - Kusaha, P.S.- Kasba, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 14-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners have approached this Court for quashing, the order dated 04.03.2024 passed by learned A.C.J.M.-2nd, Purnea in connection with Kasba P.S. Case No. 297 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506 and 34 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of D.P. Act. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32275 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/2 3. Upon specific quarry from learned counsel for the petitioners about the stage of the case in the Court below to which learned counsel for the petitioners have fairly submitted that by efflux of time, the stage in court below has considerably changed, charges came to be framed and the evidences have also started in this case. 4. In view of such, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage, this quashing application is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. shivam/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T