IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 61/2025 Decided on: 26.03.2025 Rajesh Kumar …..Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Meenakshi Tomar, Advocate vice Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pursuant to the judgment in question, the respondents are now paying enhanced salary to the petitioner. The arrears shall be paid to the petitioner within defined time limit. Learned counsel further submits that in terms of the decision in Vikram Singh Vs. HRTC2 , the respondents- Corporation is bound to pay interest on the delayed payment @ 6% per annum. 2. Taking note of the above, the present proceedings are closed with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWPOA NO.2343/2020 decided on 09.11.2023 2 remedy, at an appropriate stage, in case necessity so arises. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge March, 26.2025 (rohit)