Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60497 (KAR)

SMT BASAVVA W/O CHANABASAPPA ANGADI v. SMT SUSHEELA W/O PRABHAPPA MUNDARAGI

WP/104404/2025 · 2025-11-20

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15966 WP No. 104404 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 104404 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. BASAVVA W/O CHANABASAPPA ANGADI, AGE ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SANKLIPUR, TQ. KUNDAGOL, DIST. DHARWAD-581 113. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOK T. KATTIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SUSHEELAVVA W/O PRABHAPPA MUNDARAGI, AGE ABOUT 86 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DANDELI, GANESH NAGAR, EWS-6, TQ. HALIYAL, DIST. KARWAR, U.K.-581 325. 2. SHRI. SHIVAYOGI S/O PRABHAPPA MUNDARAGI, AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYER, R/O. DANDELI, GANESH NAGAR, EWS-6, TQ. HALIYAL, DIST. KARWAR, U.K.-581 325. 3. SHRI. IRANNA S/O. PRABHAPPA MUNDARAGI, AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. SHETKHI, R/O. DANDELI, GANESH NAGAR, EWS-6, TQ. HALIYAL, DIST. KARWAR, U.K.-581 325. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.22 11:20:01 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15966 WP No. 104404 of 2025 4. SHRI. SHANMUKHAPPA S/O. BASAPPA MUNDARAGI, AGE ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. SHETKHI, R/O. BHAGAWAN NAGAR, INDI, TQ. INDI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-586 209. 5. SMT. SHARAVVA W/O. RAJU BAGALI, AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. GOURI ANGALA VONI, NEAR OLD JHAIL KHANI, KOPPAL, TQ. KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583 238. 6. SMT. MAHALINGAVVA W/O FAKKEERAPPA MUNDARAGI, AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O. DEVIHAL, TQ. SHIRAHATTI, DIST. GADAG-582 120. HER NEXT FRIEND GURURAJ S/O CHANNABASAPPA ANGADI. … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO RECTIFY THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS HEREIN O.S. NO.88/2009 DATED 12-10-2011, CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, LAXMESHWAR AT ANNEXURE-B AND ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO RECTIFY THE COMPROMISE DECREE BEFORE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, LAXMESHWAR O.S. NO.88/2009 DATED 12-10-2011 AT ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15966 WP No. 104404 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an error in the application of compromise petition filed before the Trial Court and consequently, the same error has occurred in the compromise decree. 2. It is submitted that application was sought to be moved for correction of the decree after the disposal of the case and same is not accepted by the Trial Court. 3. It is made clear that for correction of the typographical error, the application is maintainable even after the disposal of the suit. 4. Hence, the following: ORDER i. The petition is disposed of. ii. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file an application before the Trial Court. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15966 WP No. 104404 of 2025 iii. If such application is filed by the party and other parties do not have any objection, if the Court is satisfied that the error is typographical, such application may be considered in accordance with law. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CLK CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 10