Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60492 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. RAJESAB S/O. LALSAB MURNAL,

WP/63736/2012 · 2025-08-29

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11038 WP No. 63736 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 63736 OF 2012 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, BAGALKOT DIVISION, BAGALKOT, THE PETITIONER IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, NWKRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, HUBLI. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VEENA HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: RAJESAB S/O. LALSAB MURNAL, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. NEERALAKERI, TQ: BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING, 1950 ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI THERE BY QUASHING THE AWARD DATED 02.12.2011 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT, BIJAPUR IN KID NO.36/2011 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO DISMISS THE KID NO.36/2011 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT BIJAPUR, THE COPY OF THE SAME IS AT ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI THERE BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 03.09.2011 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT BIJAPUR IN KID YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11038 WP No. 63736 of 2012 NO.36/2011 ISSUE NO.I AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO HOLD THAT THE DE CONDUCTED BY THE PETITIONER CORPORATION IS FAIR AND PROPER THE COPY OF THE SAME IS AT ANNEXURE-D TO THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL 1. That the petitioner is the divisional controller, which is pending before this Court. 2. That for certain the party want to settle the matter out of Court. 3. That the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the instant case WP 63736/2012. Kindly accept this memo. Date: 29.08.2025 Sd/- Place:Dharwad Advocate for petitioner Veena Hegde” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11038 WP No. 63736 of 2012 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE YAN CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38