Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60483 (KAR)

KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

MFA/104531/2024 · 2025-11-07

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15287 MFA No. 104531 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 104531 OF 2024 (LAC) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED, BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SINGATALURU LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT, KNNL, MUNDARAGI-582 118. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GADAG. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KNNL, SINGATALURU LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT, HUVINHADAGALI-583219, DIST: BALLARI. 3. GOUSUSAB S/O. HUSENSAB DOTYAL, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BARADUR, TQ: MUNDARAGI-582113, DIST: GADAG. …RESPONDENTS GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15287 MFA No. 104531 of 2024 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 64 (1) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN LAC NO. 44/2020 DATED 12.01.2024 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY 2013; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG AND THE LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY 2013 PASSED IN LAC NO.44/2020 DATED 12.01.2024 AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) The appeal was filed in the year 2024 and till now, office objections are not complied. Sufficient time already granted. This Court does not find any grounds to grant further time. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE RH CT-MCK/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3