SRI SANJAY ALIAS SANJEEVKUMAR S/O LAXMAN HUTAGI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/103514/2025 · 2025-08-01
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60481 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60481 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9558 WP No. 103514 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 103514 OF 2025 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SANJAY @ SANJEEVKUMAR S/O. LAXMAN HUTAGI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE JOB, R/O. DESAI ONI, DORA GALLI, HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DISTRICT: DHARWAD-580018. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEMANTHKUMAR L. HAVARAGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU, PIN 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DHARWAD, DISTRICT: DHARWAD, D C COMPOUND, DHARWAD-580001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DHARWAD, DISTRICT: DHARWAD, D C COMPOUND, DHARWAD-580001. 4. THE COMMISSIONER HUBBALLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HUBBALLI, DISTRICT: DHARWAD-580023. Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9558 WP No. 103514 of 2025
5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HUBBALLI DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ZONAL NO.7, AKSHYA PARK, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580023. 6. SHRI RAJEKHAN S/O. MAHAMADALI TOTAGAR, AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. GOULIGALLI, OLD HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580023. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHARAD MAGADUM, AGA FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.3 AND 4 TO CONSIDERED THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 25/06/2024 AND 28/06/2024 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND L RESPECTIVELY, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: A. A writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 and 4 to considered the representations dated 25/06/2024 and 28/06/2024 given by the petitioner, Vide Annexure-K and L respectively. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9558 WP No. 103514 of 2025
B. Issue any other writ or direction, which this Hon’ble court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. By way of representations dated 25.06.2024 and 28.06.2024, what the petitioner had sought for is the entry of the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. The same not having been considered by respondent Nos.4 and 5, the above petition has been filed. 3.
The entry of the name of the petitioner or owner of any land cannot be made on the basis of representation. The same can be made if a proper application accompanied by the necessary documents is submitted to the jurisdictional authority. Such a Mandamus cannot be issued in the matter. 4. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to submit an appropriate application accompanied by necessary documents, which shall be considered by respondents in accordance with law, once filed,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9558 WP No. 103514 of 2025
within the time frame prescribed under the Karnataka Sakala Services Act, 2011 And (Amendment) Act, 2014, petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM/- CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 71