Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60471 (PNJ)

BOHAR SINGH v. ABHIMANYU RANA

COCP/2585/2025 · 2025-07-03

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 105 Bohar Singh Bohar Singh Bohar Singh Bohar Singh Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab CORAM CORAM CORAM CORAM Present : VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL 1. learned counsel for the petitioner, without circulating any adjournment slip. Even on the last date of hearing, i.e. adjournment was made. 2. this stage. 3. revive the 3333rd rd rd rd July July July July, 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 ‘raj’ Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION : DATE OF DECISION : DATE OF DECISION : DATE OF DECISION : Bohar Singh Bohar Singh Bohar Singh Bohar Singh Versus Versus Versus Versus Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab :::: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL * * * * Ms. Urunika Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Judgepreet Singh Warring, * * * * VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL, J. , J. , J. , J. (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) A request for adjournment has been made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner, without circulating any adjournment slip. Even on the last date of hearing, i.e. adjournment was made. In view of the above, the present petition is di this stage. Liberty is granted to the learned counsel for revive the present petition as and when he , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2585 of 2025 COCP No.2585 of 2025 COCP No.2585 of 2025 COCP No.2585 of 2025 DATE OF DECISION : DATE OF DECISION : DATE OF DECISION : DATE OF DECISION : 3333RD RD RD RD JU JU JU JULY LY LY LY, , , , 20 20 20 2022225555 …. . . . Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab Sh. Abhimanyu Rana, SSP, Tarn Taran, Punjab …. Respondent . Respondent . Respondent . Respondent VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL nika Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Judgepreet Singh Warring, Advocate for the petitioner. for adjournment has been made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner, without circulating any adjournment slip. Even on the last date of hearing, i.e. 22.05.2025 a request for In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of at learned counsel for petitioner to he is ready to argue the matter. (((( VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL VIKAS BAHL )))) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes No Yes No COCP No.2585 of 2025 COCP No.2585 of 2025 COCP No.2585 of 2025 COCP No.2585 of 2025 5555 Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner . Respondent . Respondent . Respondent . Respondent for adjournment has been made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner, without circulating any adjournment 2.05.2025 a request for sposed of at petitioner to RAJ KUMAR 2025.07.04 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgment