Narinder Kumar and others vs. Rikhi Ram (since deceased) through LRs a/w connected matter CMP No.13179 of 2023 with RSA No. 471 of 2005 CMP No.13179 of 2023 17.10.2025 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur and Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocates, for the applicants. Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(a), 1(c), 3(a) to 3(c), 4, 5, 7(a) to 7(e) and proposed LRs No.2(a) to 2(c). RSA No. 471 of 2023 Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c), 3(a) to 3(c), 4 to 6 and proposed LRs No.2(a) to 2(c). Respondents No.7(a) to 7(e) and 8 and 11 are ex parte vide order dated 06.08.2019. CMP(M) No. 1554 of 2025 in RSA No. ___ of 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The legal heir of deceased respondent No.2 as mentioned in Paragraph-2 of the application are duly served and represented by a counsel. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the contesting non-applicants. They have no objection if in case the application is allowed and the legal heirs as are mentioned in the application are ordered to be brought on record. Respondent No.2 had died on 22.11.2024. Respondent No.2 is survived by his legal heirs mentioned in Paragraph-2 of the application. The right to sue survives/inheres in the said legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2. For the sufficient cause shown in the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 is condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside. Legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 are ordered to be brought on record. Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks. The application stands disposed of. CMP(M) No.1046 of 2025 in RSA No.471 of 2005 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The legal heir of deceased respondent No.2 as mentioned in Paragraph-2 of the application are duly served and represented by a counsel. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the contesting non-applicants. They have no objection if in case the application is allowed and the legal heirs as are mentioned in the application are ordered to be brought on record. Respondent No.2 had died on 22.11.2024. Respondent No.2 is survived by his legal heirs mentioned in Paragraph-2 of the application. The right to sue survives/inheres in the said legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2. For the sufficient cause shown in the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 is condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside. Legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 are ordered to be brought on record. Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks. The application stands disposed of. ( Bipin C. Negi ) October 17, 2025 (KS) Judge