Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60467 (PNJ)

WAZIR SINGH v. VIVEK AGGARWAL

COCP/2580/2025 · 2025-05-22

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 Wazir Singh Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Panchkula CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP State of Haryana and othe in terms of statement made by learned counsel for the State that “…the pending legal notice will be decided by respondent No.2 Director General, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordanc submits that in compliance of order dated 25.4.2024 (Annexure P a speaking order dated 24.1.2025 has been passed by the respondent. COCP-2580-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2580 of 2025 Date of decision : Wazir Singh Versus Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Director, Elementary Education Haryana, Panchkula CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 25.4.2024 (Annexure P- Bench of this Court in CWP-9217-2024 State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of in terms of statement made by learned counsel for the State that “…the pending legal notice will be decided by respondent No.2 Director General, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two months.” At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 25.4.2024 (Annexure P a speaking order dated 24.1.2025 has been passed by the respondent. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2580 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-22.05.2025 …..Petitioner Director, Elementary Education Haryana, …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying -1) passed by a co-ordinate 2024 titled as “Wazir Singh vs. rs”, vide which the petition was disposed of in terms of statement made by learned counsel for the State that “…the pending legal notice will be decided by respondent No.2-The Director General, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order e with law, within a period of two months.” At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 25.4.2024 (Annexure P-1), a speaking order dated 24.1.2025 has been passed by the respondent. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.23 16.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated the present petition. the learned counsel for the respondent thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper does not press the present petition any further. aforesaid speaking order dated 24.1.2025 s per law. May 22, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2580-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for the respondent that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 24.1.2025 by the respondent; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, learned counsel f does not press the present petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid speaking order dated 24.1.2025 s per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State also submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking by the respondent; thus, no cause survives in Copy of the aforesaid order dated 24.1.2025 produced by State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid speaking order dated 24.1.2025 s per law. ny, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.23 16.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document