Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133905 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 793 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rampal Dutt Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Bhola Nath Yadav,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead "Basic Education Officer, District- Saharanpur" as party- respondent no.5 during the course of the day. Heard Mr. Anand Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. J.P. Singh, learned counsel for repondent-B.S.A. as well as learned Sanding Counsel for the State. The present petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondents to pay the retiremental dues with interest to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who was working as teacher in Block Nagal, District- Saharanpur retired after rendering his service of 32 years, 8 months and 8 days. The petitioner moved an application in his department in order to sought information of his P.F. account from 1982 to 30.06.2012 but the department only provided the statement from 2004 to 30.06.2012. He further submits that when the petitioner again approached the department, they provided information till the year 1995. The petitioner compared his G.P.F. with other teacher of his department after which he found that the respondents have embezzled Rs.1,90,000/- from his P.F. account. Demanding the same, the petitioner moved an application before the respondent no.2- Finance Controlled Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P. The complaint made by the petitioner was decided and the department gave the payment of the P.F. account from the period of 2004 to 30.06.2012 only. The respondents have not provided the statement of P.F. account of the petitioner from the financial year 1981-1982 to 2004 and have also not provided him the P.F. amount of Rs.1,90,000/- to the petitioner. For ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving application/representation. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the State-respondents submits that in case petitioner moves fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.5-Basic Education Officer, District- Saharanpur within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.5 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 7.8.2025/Kalp Nath Singh Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad